Monday, November 20, 2006

The Names Bond..James Bond

Well there are bond movies & there are bond movies.what can I say about the latest bond movie?it was utterly disgusting?horrible?pathetic?all of them?

The most highly expected & costliest bond movie till date happens to be the worst movie of all times.the charm,the machismo,the chivalry,the wry humor,the chauvinism everything was missing.

Craig Daniels is not the bond,cannot be the bond.there is so much disconnect between Fleming's character & him.last heard that there was some noise in Ian's grave.hes more perfect for the super human roles with his physique & metro sexual looks.this film runs only coz of Eva green.she would have been the perfect foil to the bond,not Craig.

And where are the gadgets & where's Q?I always thought bond movies where guns,gadjets,gags & gals.which was there,I couldn't decide.And the screen play overall,everything seems so dis jointed.the film lacks continuity & a good theme song.what role had the villain to play,who was the villain anyway.

But one point I need to agree,in this age of x-men & supermen this is closest to being human.at least he gets a heart attack & is worried about his little finger much more than anything.& bond falling in love?on his first assignment?give me a break!this is probably only the second movie that discusses about bonds personal life as far as I remember.so kudos to the director on that.

Iam no bond expert.but I surely have seen 97% of the movies.with casino royale we see the other side of the 007.but still its a huge dampener for bond aficionados like me.too many rope tricks,too less gadgets,an absolute sick screen play & a very terrible bond.
One last word,bring back pierce,if not for Sean or roger or timothy,at least make Jackie Chan the bond,I could live with him...

No comments:

webring

Powered by WebRing.